Choosing between a WASR-10 and a Zastava M70 can be a tough decision for any AK enthusiast. Both are AKM-pattern rifles known for their reliability and affordability, but subtle differences exist that cater to different preferences and priorities. This in-depth comparison will dissect the key aspects of each rifle, helping you make an informed choice.
Key Differences: A Quick Overview
Before delving into the specifics, here's a concise summary of the core distinctions between the WASR-10 and the Zastava M70:
| Feature | WASR-10 | Zastava M70 |
|---|---|---|
| Manufacturer | Romanian (formerly Cugir) | Serbian (Zastava Arms) |
| Finish | Typically parkerized, can vary | Typically parkerized, often higher quality |
| Receiver | Generally considered less refined | Generally considered more refined |
| Fit & Finish | Can be inconsistent across different batches | Usually more consistent and tighter tolerances |
| Price | Generally less expensive | Generally more expensive |
WASR-10: The Budget-Friendly Workhorse
The WASR-10, produced in Romania, has long been a favorite among budget-conscious AK owners. Its affordability makes it an excellent entry point into the world of AK rifles. However, this affordability often comes with compromises in terms of fit and finish.
Advantages of the WASR-10:
- Price: Significantly cheaper than the Zastava M70, making it accessible to a wider range of shooters.
- Availability: Generally easier to find in stock compared to the Zastava M70, particularly in certain regions.
- Reliability: While fit and finish might be less refined, WASR-10s are known for their rugged reliability, capable of handling harsh conditions.
Disadvantages of the WASR-10:
- Inconsistent Quality: Fit and finish can vary significantly between rifles. Some may have tighter tolerances than others, while others might exhibit rougher machining or less-than-perfect assembly.
- Receiver Quality: The receiver is often cited as an area where the WASR-10 can fall short compared to the Zastava. While functional, it may not be as precisely machined.
- Finish: The parkerized finish, while durable, can be less aesthetically pleasing than the finish found on some Zastava M70s.
Zastava M70: The Premium AK Experience
The Zastava M70, manufactured in Serbia, represents a step up in quality and craftsmanship compared to the WASR-10. While more expensive, it often justifies the price tag with superior fit, finish, and overall build quality.
Advantages of the Zastava M70:
- Superior Fit and Finish: Generally boasts tighter tolerances, smoother actions, and a more refined overall feel.
- Higher-Quality Receiver: The receiver is typically considered to be more precisely machined and robust.
- Consistent Quality: Zastava maintains a higher level of consistency in its manufacturing processes, resulting in more uniform quality across different rifles.
- Improved Aesthetics: The parkerized finish is often of better quality, resulting in a more aesthetically pleasing rifle.
Disadvantages of the Zastava M70:
- Price: Substantially more expensive than the WASR-10.
- Availability: Can be harder to find in stock compared to the WASR-10.
The Verdict: Which AK is Right for You?
The best choice between the WASR-10 and the Zastava M70 depends entirely on your individual needs and budget.
-
Choose the WASR-10 if: You're on a tight budget, prioritize affordability, and need a reliable AKM-pattern rifle that can handle hard use. You're comfortable with potential inconsistencies in fit and finish.
-
Choose the Zastava M70 if: You're willing to spend more for a superior quality rifle with tighter tolerances, a smoother action, and a more refined overall experience. You prioritize consistency and a higher level of craftsmanship.
Ultimately, both rifles are capable and reliable firearms. The decision comes down to your budget and your tolerance for potential variations in quality. Thorough research and careful consideration of your priorities will lead you to the best choice for your needs.
